![]() ![]() I suspect that earlier generations that still had dragons didn't take too much notice of the waking dragons from stone part. I don't see how one can be a recent woods witch prophecy and the other 5000 years old when they clearly have complete overlap in every detail that has been mentioned. It is claar that Mel's AA and Aemon's PtwP is the same prophecy - aside from Mel using both terms (she could be just co-opting the PtwP prophecy in order to get Westerosi support for her AA), its clear that the requirements for both use the same features - born amidst soke and salt, heralded by a bleeding star/red comet, and waking dragons from stone/the dragons are the proof.īut Mel claims this prophecy is 5000 years old, not recent. ![]() His (or her) birth (literal or metaphorical I guess) will involve smoke and salt. He seems to expect that when the WftD happens, the PtwP should be involved. It seems that Aemon believes the PtwP is supposed to be directly connected to the war for the Dawn. ![]() So here are a few things that seem to be relevant. I think we can be fairly confident that Aemon knows the exact wording and/or context of the PtwP prophecy, be it weasely words or no. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |